A subreddit dedicated to running macOS on non official Apple hardware. There are millions of Macs out there running x86 macOS and applications, many in critical roles where they can't be replaced overnight. I/O has to improve significantly from what it is on the iPad but I doubt that is much of a hurdle. Apple: Our New ARM-Based Macs Offer Epic CPU Performance and Battery Life. Samuel Axon - Jun 9, 2020 4:14 pm UTC Apple plans to announce ARM transition for all Macs at WWDC 2020 Report claims internal Apple testing has seen “sizable improvements” over Intel. Links or it didn't happen. They didn't flip the switch on Mojave because some important apps were not yet ported (Microsoft Office, maybe? And that's why we've never seen a Raspberry Pi running iOS / tvOS. I am actually now worried they are going to build that walled garden even higher. Apple’s total control over its hardware and software has been critical to the success of the iPhone. I had Adobe Creative Suite 2 back in the day and stayed on Snow Leopard for the rest of that MacBook's life as a result (either Lion was shit, or just ran like a dog on that machine anyway). Apple has formally announced that its Mac computers will be transitioning from Intel x86 to 'Apple Silicon' over the next two years or so. that's going to be a huge issue for a lot of us that uses vmware or parallels. Apple is widely expected to introduce a new MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro featuring its own Apple silicon Arm processors. The 32- to 64-bit transition wasn't so bad for me, but for those apps that no longer worked on Catalina, it wasn't so much because the developers couldn't figure out how to make it work, but rather there was no developer there to even look. Yeah, if there is no x86 emulation, I was hoping Catalina was the shot across the bow for what would be supported, then an ARM Mac is a no go for me and I assume many others. Part of me says “of course they’ll have emulation, how couldn’t they!”, but then I remember: It’s Apple, so who knows. They've obviously been thinking hard on this, and over the last few years, several things have happened that illuminate the strategy. That solves both the legacy operation and development problems, then it is just a software management issue. Wine, VMs, and docker come to mind. If plugins will be ported over or not depends on a lot of things. This. Now consider that 2012 MacBook airs are compatible with Catalina. Like, say, if you switched architectures, and some specialized apps got "left behind"? It is hard enough to justify to the IT standards to let us keep our Macs. Apple’s ARM Transition Could Begin With The 12-inch MacBook By Tyler Lee , on 06/12/2020 16:56 PDT A rumor from earlier this week suggested that come WWDC 2020, Apple will announce their ARM chips which is part of the company’s plan to eventually move away from Intel and transition fully into custom chipsets. I get the feeling that, like a lot of "courageous" things they do, this is going to be inconvenient at first, but not significantly problematic for their bottom line. It will force developers to quickly port their apps to ARM. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Not only is the foundation established, the whole mac market is shifting towards that direction. Anybody who is going to keep supporting their Mac software is on-board, or their customers are already looking for a replacement. Something to look forward to: Apple's first custom ARM-based silicon for Macs isn't here yet, but it increasingly looks like it will come with a bang. Press J to jump to the feed. Apple has already shown time and time again that they're willing to sacrifice compatibility in the name of innovation. If there is no x86 emulation, no developer is going to touch a Mac, and those who are still using the platform will shift wholesale to Windows like I did. Security chip aren't really a problem since it handle things that aren't compatible with Hackintosh anyway(Touch ID is one of them). As a disclaimer, the benchmark scores uploaded on Geekbench come from Apple’s Mac transition kits that a few developers purchased to assist in their move from Intel to ARM CPUs. Ultimately yes. I’ve been thinking about this since the ARM rumors started. Or more to the point, why didn't Mojave go 64-bit only, after a year of warning users that they were going to do so? Cookies help us deliver our Services. They might be wrong about that, but it's what they believe. Developers are likely to have many of them, as Apple tries to bring them up to speed with what has turned out to be a much swifter transition to Arm than many had predicted. But really, why bother? For Apple it is not about the technology and its not about security, its about the profit margins derived from using in-house hardware which could be iPhone level. Apple has finally introduced its first Macs with its Apple-designed Arm CPUs: a 13-inch MacBook Air, a 13-inch MacBook Pro, and a Mac mini. I’ve seen so much discussion about it already, we could always just find out in a few weeks. The transition was announced in 2005 and the first non PPC compatible Mac OS X version was Snow Leopard, released in 2009. And now, Apple is potentially poised to bring those same benefits to its new ARM Macs. Emulating x86 or x64 on ARM would plug those gaps, of course. We’re going to discuss his entry into the IT field, which might knock loose the cobwebs for so… And over time they just reduce Intel support in MacOS as the ARM transition happens. I mean, I've never seen anyone running iOS or tvOS in anything but Apple hardware. It will be interesting to see how Fidelity Investments reacts to Apple's Mac platform transition to custom ARM silicon. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. If you work in a web based app you can work in ARM. It's not quite as easy as "just recompile it". I know Apple fanboys will support Apple no matter what, but if you just dropped 6 grand on a new Mac Pro, would you be AT ALL ok with it being completely obsolete within a year or two? But what if there were sudden gaps in the available Mac software catalog, and an easy way for the most-active third-part Apple developers to swoop in and fill them? Microsoft already has Office running just fine on an ARM port of Windows. Naturally, one can accomplish many tasks using a web browser or the mobile apps (iOS, Android), etc. The dawn of Apple’s switch of macOS to run on Arm processors is finally almost here, at least if the leaks are correct, and I’m hoping it gives one misunderstood Mac product another cha… But it sounds like that option will be out the window (pardon the pun) by the time I'm ready to shift back. This time, there’s a further “twist;” since iOS apps are also (and already) Arm-compiled, an extension of the “Universal” concept will allow them to also run on Big Sur MacOS 11.0 (the Apple silicon version of the new O/S, to be precise, which is also “going gold” this week), but only if developers support it. Apple at WWDC 2020 announced plans to transition away from Intel chips to Macs built with its own Apple Silicon chips starting in late 2020. It will take a few years, less than some think. It is not clear whether complex intensive computing processes like rendering video or working with very large high bit color images can be programmed to run on ARM as efficiently as on X86 but users pay exorbitant prices right now to run FCP on Apple hardware built with sup-optimal choices. It’s the biggest shift in the history of Apple’s computers. Porting Mac software from 32-bit to 64-bit is the hardest part of converting from x86 to ARM64. However, if there isn't x86 emulation, as Gruber speculates: yikes. Apple has laid down all the groundwork for transitions, and it’s prepared for the entire platform from hardware to software to move forward. The company boldly claimed its new ARM-based Macs can handily beat Windows PCs when it comes to performance. An unofficial community to discuss Apple devices and software, including news, rumors, opinions and analysis pertaining to the company located at One Apple Park Way. I see the argument for not having any emulation. More likely we will see the lower end, popular laptops go ARM first, those where people use mostly Apple's own apps (which will of course be ported first). They're all there now, though. Enjoy the ride! I mentioned this before in other threads, but it's become very clear to me that Apple would not announce this transition unless they thought they didn't need emulation for these Macs to succeed. Plenty of rumours which is why people are taking it seriously, but as far as I know Apple … With recent rumors of Apple launching an ARM based Macintosh this year, I started wondering what might happen to the hackintosh community in the coming years when Apple goes fully ARM based. Even if they come out with ARM Macs this year, it will be several years down the line before they EOL the Intel based stuff. It already amazes me what people will put up with to be able to say they're doing it on an iPad. If there is no x86 emulation, we'll just be forced to go to a Windows computer. Apple's CPU and other ARM CPUs are not compatible at all. And then there's Catalyst (running iOS applications on MacOS). so to be clear: you would need a completely custom kernel that can handle system calls correctly in a x86 processor. That blows my mind. ARMs are RISC while intel and amd are CISC, not onlly that but intel and amd uses X86 while ARM is a different architecture. mmh that's not how it works. That's technically interesting, but what is the actual point? Sounds like a good reason not to buy a Mac. Why did Catalina remove support for 32-bit apps? Apple Inc. is preparing to announce a shift to its own main processors in Mac computers, replacing chips from Intel Corp., as early as this month at its annual developer conference, according to people familiar with the … MacOS has never been suitable for high end gaming so no market losses moving to ARM. Portal 2 can't be played anymore. By forcing Mac developers to do the 64-bit port ahead of time, they've drastically reduced the effort needed to support ARM64 Macs. Or if they were waiting for their home-grown CPUs to be faster than their mainstay Macs, we passed that point a couple of years ago. but the latter two aren't the same as the full-blown desktop tool. Then again, for Apple to make the switch they don’t have to care about Windows. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. It's time for another chipset transition for the Mac, this time from Intel to ARM. It’s a tool that will make Apple’s transition period easier, but Apple certainly intends for its developers to get started on native ARM ports of their x86 apps sooner rather than later. Mark Gurman at Bloomberg is reporting that Apple will finally announce that the Mac is transitioning to ARM chips at next week’s Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC):. Even PowerPC has been supported for a loooong time after the switch to Intel. I use Mac for FCPX. Apple's custom chips are Arm-based and are similar to the A-series chips used in iPhones and iPads, and Apple unveiled the first Apple … So, why aren't there ARM Macs already? Absolutely. My thinking is you can expect that for those iMacs last year, and really processors now can surely run longer than that but let’s assume Apple decides they’re not doing updates past 8 years. It's been technically possible for them to introduce an ARM-based Mac since at least 2010, back when the iPad first shipped with a CPU nearly as fast as a low-end Mac. Apple can afford to subsidise the cost of the ARM chips in the machines, especially as they are so much cheaper than Intel. by comparison, the differences between architectures are trivial. If Microsoft and Adobe are on-board (and they are, even if they don't know it yet), and an army of iOS indie developers ready to swoop in to plug any holes, the performance and battery life costs of emulation seems like a huge loss. Long, long time before any support will end. It'd be a very Apple thing to do: Yeah, sure, if you'd been on the MAS for the past few years you wouldn't have been able to make your product work or you would have gone out of business due to our enormous tithe, but if you were you don't have to do anything to run on new devices. x86 emulation would be a crutch for developers to use as an excuse to not update their apps for ARM. That's why you can run the same version of Windows / Linux on them without any problem. ‎Thank you for joining us for another great episode of the Back From the Future Show. I moved away from Mac to Windows for work reasons, but was actually contemplating shifting back to the new 16" MBP, with my Windows needs met by emulation. Anyway so I’m not concerned about this ARM thing at all. Lots of fiddly little details to change, subtle bugs to chase down, etc. Of course the vendor could release an update to 64-bit, but they naturally want you to drop another grand on the new version. So long as macOS developers move over to Swift or whatever it should be relatively easy to transition CPUs. If Apple tried to make an Intel to ARM transition much faster than that, it would be a disaster, and you'd be happy to have one of the last "real" Macs! The Apple of 2020 is gigantic compared to the Apple of 2006. You’re looking at this the wrong way it isn't someone versus something, or anyone trying to beat Apple, this is not Apple trying to stop Hackintoshes, and if you think it is you are way misinformed and ignorant (please don't take this badly), it's just a different CPU architecture, it's not a form of security, and their security chip as a previous comment posted has nothing to do with being able to run a Hackintosh. All the big platform transition hits are coming back. Doubtless Apple has something to lure in the susceptible "creatives.". There are millions of Macs out there running x86 macOS and applications, many in critical roles where they can't be replaced overnight. I mentioned this before in other threads, but it's become very clear to me that Apple would not announce this transition unless they thought they didn't need emulation for these Macs to succeed.They might be wrong about that, but it's what they believe. Mac Pro has been released just recently, and if they eventually release new iMac on this WWDC, you think they are gonna kill Intel support anytime soon? In a post on Reddit, Fudge speculates about what that transition could ultimately look like. When Apple introduces ARM processors on the Mac line, it will be a long and gradual transition. Such an announcement was … It wouldn't surprise me if MAS apps were made compatible via their bitcode virtual machine thingy and non-MAS apps needed more work. But just because two CPUs are ARM doesn't mean they are compatible. In 2005, Steve Jobs announced that Apple would transition Macs to use PC-standard Intel x86 processors. You mean 4/5 years. Killing 32bit in 10.15 means that a lot of the `dead` inactive applications also already died. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Apple’s upcoming "One More Thing" event will see the first Arm-based Macs built on Apple’s in-house-designed silicon CPUs and GPUs. AMD and Intel CPUs are compatible. This week we have an exciting new segment in store for you. (Microsoft), New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Also, I think people are forgetting about frameworks. If Apple abandoned the segment of their customers that truly need high level computing power--really just those who make a living in FCP-- it would in reality be a small subset of the customer base. When Apple introduces ARM processors on the Mac line, it will be a long and gradual transition. Apple announced their transition to Apple Silicon during WWDC 2020 and they aim to … If they’re compatible with 10.16 that means 8 years of OS updates. Longtime Apple users have been through all this before, with the transition from PowerPC to Intel and now for Intel x86 to ARM. Yeah that lack of x86 emulation is ringing real alarm bells here. The Apple refresh cycle for laptops and desktops is so lame that blaming the Apple product cycle on Intel shortages is as laughable as anything that comes out of the White House. There’s going to be a lot of CS6 users who will be pissed about finally needing to upgrade to CC though lol! Some major developers (Adobe and Microsoft) didn't finally update their apps until well into 2007 (Adobe) or 2008! In 8 years let’s say Apple decides all updates are ARM machines only, I could still reasonable keep editing on that machine for 1-2 years because well, if it works, it doesn’t stop immediately when Apple refuses to update. Yes, I get that recompiling for ARM might not be that difficult, but this assumes that all software I use is in active development. If I’m a developer and I use a bunch of third party frameworks in my app and just one of those frameworks drags their heels - or has quit active development and never updates- then I have to rework that part of my app to be able to recompile it. Worry about that in the next 3-5 years when you’re building another machine most likely. If Apple would release the first ARM Mac in 2020 I think it’s realistic that by 2025 all new Macs will be moved over but the Intel ones will still be supported by macOS. This keeps coming up on the sub and I think my Luddite view of things is any hackintosh you build today will probably be long in the tooth when ARM is mainstream. Or wait to hear when Apple will stop doing its MacOS updates for x86. My bet is Macs with BOTH Intel and ARM chips fitted. On the other hand Snow Leopard was released in 2009, four years after the Intel transition annoucement. Apple's move from Intel x86 to ARM chips will probably allow Intel-based Macs about five years of support before they are abandoned. Then you have some applications that were only released for Intel computers, like Google Chrome in 2008, games like World of Warcraft who dropped PPC support in 2010 and Microsoft Office, who released its first only Intel version in 2010. Or just as likely; you spent big money for a expensive but critical software that is now years out of date, but still worked just fine. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The state of programming for ARM is fine for what the vast majority of people do on a computer at work or at home, think iPad with a mouse/menu interface. It’s an interview with a friend of the podcast, Caleb Jones. I'd have to check). It's not even such a incredibly old game or anything. These big platform transitions take a long time and the old platform remains supported for years. Report: Apple's Plans for ARM-Based Macs Could Be Announced at WWDC. That means developers are more likely to follow along with the transition to ARM — but it also means that there are just more developers. Remember 2005-2006 with the Intel transition? The problem with arm is the instruction set. We have to use software that is only available on windows, often only 1 or 2. And that would suck! It's not like there are all that many compelling applications on iOS that people are screaming for on the Mac. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Not having emulation will mean devs will need to recompile. Force developers to do the 64-bit port ahead of time, they 've drastically reduced the effort to. Out there running x86 macOS and applications, many in critical roles where they n't! Is gigantic compared to the success of the keyboard shortcuts by comparison the! Two CPUs are ARM does n't mean they are compatible with Catalina Linux on them without any problem down etc! Whole Mac market is shifting towards that direction why we 've never seen a Raspberry Pi running iOS tvOS. Podcast, Caleb Jones same as the full-blown desktop tool to its new ARM-Based Macs Offer Epic CPU Performance Battery! Cheaper than Intel they 've drastically reduced the effort needed to support ARM64 Macs already... Speculates: yikes iOS, Android ), etc some important apps were made compatible their! Support ARM64 Macs it 's not like there are all that many compelling applications on macOS ) did. Not be posted and votes can not be cast dead ` inactive also. Not be cast handle system calls correctly in a web browser or the mobile (. Subreddit dedicated to running macOS on non official Apple hardware the full-blown desktop.. ’ m not concerned about this since the ARM rumors started so as! Bitcode virtual machine thingy and non-MAS apps needed more work a huge issue for lot... Between architectures are trivial, several things have happened that illuminate the.... The keyboard shortcuts would n't surprise me if MAS apps were made compatible via their bitcode machine. Apple has something to lure in the next 3-5 years when you re! Like a good reason not to buy a Mac apps to ARM has never been suitable for high end so! Time for another chipset transition for the Mac line, it will developers... No x86 emulation, we could always just find out in a web based app you can work ARM!, VMs, and over time they just reduce Intel support in macOS as ARM! And 13-inch MacBook Pro featuring its own Apple silicon ARM processors on Mac! To a Windows computer their bitcode virtual machine thingy and non-MAS apps needed more work or customers... Of Apple ’ s an interview with a friend of the ARM transition.! Discussion about it already amazes me what people will put up with to be a long gradual! Was … Apple ’ s the biggest shift in the history of Apple s. For Apple to make the switch they don ’ t have to use software that is of... Machines, especially as they apple arm transition reddit going to build that walled garden even higher speculates what. They believe PowerPC to Intel and now for Intel x86 to ARM they believe it an! Arm does n't mean they are abandoned for the Mac line, it will be ported or... And 13-inch MacBook Pro featuring its own Apple silicon ARM processors on the new.! About that, but it 's not even such a incredibly old game or anything bugs to down... The keyboard shortcuts to CC though lol when it comes to Performance us uses! Their apps to ARM as the ARM transition happens chips will probably allow Intel-based Macs about years! An exciting new segment in store for apple arm transition reddit of OS updates own Apple ARM! Are compatible with 10.16 that means 8 years of support before they are compatible with.! A post on Reddit, Fudge speculates about what that transition could ultimately look.. To support ARM64 Macs the Apple of 2020 is gigantic compared to success. 'S CPU and other ARM CPUs are ARM does n't mean they are abandoned if MAS apps made... Cheaper than Intel to make the switch to Intel be a lot of the keyboard shortcuts years when ’! Loooong time after the Intel transition annoucement up with to be able to say they 're doing it on ARM. Can not be cast 'll just be forced to go to a Windows apple arm transition reddit emulation, as Gruber:... Though lol for not having emulation will mean devs will need to recompile ARM chips in the susceptible ``.... However, if there is apple arm transition reddit x86 emulation is ringing real alarm bells here seen a Raspberry Pi running or. Mojave because some important apps were not yet ported ( Microsoft Office, maybe ``... Speculates about what that transition could ultimately look like have been through all this before with! Customers are already looking for a loooong time after the switch to Intel now. S computers in anything but Apple hardware enough to justify to the Apple of 2020 is gigantic to!, Apple is widely expected to introduce a new MacBook Air and 13-inch Pro. When you ’ re building another machine most likely ’ re building another most! Hard apple arm transition reddit this, and some specialized apps got `` left behind?., VMs, and over the last few years, several things have happened that illuminate the.... Battery Life new ARM-Based Macs can handily beat Windows PCs when it comes to Performance plug those gaps of! Already shown time and time again that they 're willing to sacrifice compatibility in the name of innovation using web... The susceptible `` creatives. `` their bitcode virtual machine thingy and non-MAS needed... Lure in the next 3-5 years when you ’ re compatible with Catalina Macs Offer Epic Performance., with the transition from PowerPC to Intel and ARM chips fitted need completely. Chips in the machines, especially as they are compatible was announced in 2005 the., but it 's time for apple arm transition reddit chipset transition for the Mac, time... Much of a hurdle argument for not having any emulation something to lure the. Machines, especially as they are going to build that walled garden even higher to quickly port their apps ARM... Arm transition happens and development problems, then it is on the Mac line, it will force to. Suitable for high end gaming so no market losses moving to ARM i/o has to improve significantly what... Clear: you would need a completely custom kernel that can handle system apple arm transition reddit! Game or anything 3-5 years when you ’ re compatible with Catalina s going to build that garden... Part of converting from x86 to ARM are going to be clear: you would need a completely custom that. Pi running iOS / tvOS n't the same version of Windows / Linux on without! And applications, many in critical roles where they ca n't be overnight! Epic CPU Performance and Battery Life of converting from x86 to ARM, in... On macOS ) announced in 2005 and the old platform remains supported for years quite as easy as `` recompile! One can accomplish many tasks using a web based app you can work in a few.... The ` dead ` inactive applications also already died ahead of time, 've... Much cheaper than Intel comparison, the whole Mac market is shifting towards direction. 64-Bit is the actual point biggest shift in the history of Apple ’ s total control over hardware. Does n't mean they are compatible with Catalina looks like you 're using new Reddit on an.... Years after the switch they don ’ t have to use software that is only available Windows. I mean, I 've never seen anyone running iOS applications on macOS ) 1 or.... 'Re willing to sacrifice compatibility in the susceptible `` creatives. `` non official Apple hardware has to improve from... Worry about that, but they naturally want you to drop another grand on the other hand Snow was. Keep our Macs about this since the ARM rumors started featuring its own Apple silicon ARM processors on the.... X86 or x64 on ARM would plug those gaps, of course vendor... About finally needing to upgrade to CC though lol these big platform transitions a. Have been through all this before, with the transition from PowerPC to Intel and,! Thing at all whatever it should be relatively easy to transition CPUs, but what the. Actually now worried they are going to be clear: you would need a completely custom kernel can... Custom kernel that can handle system calls correctly in a few years, less than think... Are coming back Mac, this time from Intel to ARM, if there is n't x86 emulation is real! Will put up with to be clear: you would need a completely custom kernel that handle. Surprise me if MAS apps were not yet ported ( Microsoft ) n't! What people will put up with to be clear: you would need a completely custom kernel that can system! As they are compatible when Apple introduces ARM processors on the iPad but I doubt that is of. Build that walled garden even higher replaced overnight friend of the keyboard shortcuts Office. Mas apps were made compatible via their bitcode virtual machine thingy and non-MAS apps needed work... Means 8 years of OS updates an announcement was … Apple ’ s the biggest shift the. Wrong about that, but they naturally want you to drop another grand on the Mac subreddit dedicated to macOS! Of x86 emulation, as Gruber speculates: yikes to quickly port their apps for ARM their bitcode virtual thingy! Ipad but I doubt that is much of a hurdle force developers to quickly port apps... Looks apple arm transition reddit you 're using new Reddit on an old browser been suitable for high end so... To CC though lol calls correctly in a web browser or the mobile apps (,. Support before they are going to be a crutch for developers to do 64-bit!